Before this question can get to the bottom, one must understand exactly how the nicotine is indicated to come to the cigarette into existence.

On the box that is not the nicotine content of the cigarette but the determined nicotine content of inhaled smoke.

This is calculated automatically, a defined number of Züen performed by a machine. And the nicotine in the inhaled fraction extrapolated stands on the box then on the package.

In fact, a tobacco cigarette contains significantly higher doses of nicotine and are therefore also highly toxic.

For comparison : 10ml Liquid correspond approximately to a carton of cigarettes. The drink of 10ml Liquid with 18mg nicotine (NOT MAKE ! ) However, is less toxic than the consumption of only 2-3 cigarettes!

The comparison makes it very clear: The nicotine content of only one cigarette is significant, but only part of it is supplied by the combustion of the lung.

So what is not quite understood is the current dispute in the EU by nicotine -containing liquids and their classification – due to the ” high ” nicotine yield of 1.8 % ( in the strong liquids) you want to see there a pharmacy duty as justified.

Nevertheless, in the regular cigarettes the nicotine content is significantly (! ) Is higher in no way included in this debate.

It is clear. Nicotine is a poison. But Liquids come in bottles with child safety. A cigarette is not backed up. Since it is questionable what is the more dangerous.

But at the moment it looks already like it, that even in the highest echelons of the EU has no chance to regulate nicotine-containing liquid. Outweigh the benefits and the knower multiply.

Nicotine was indeed considered a danger in terms of smoking debate. It will not carcinogenic and is not a carcinogen – in some cases nicotine is even used as medicine.

How is this achieved?

We list the features that enable the electronic cigarette to replace the actions associated to the mechanism of addiction of the traditional cigarette :

1. The electronic cigarette is similar to a traditional cigar shape, so you keep your hands busy and you decide when you’ll inhale the vapor and nicotine dose.

2. The electronic cigarette emits a warm, dry steam to produce a “blow to the throat”, which is very similar to the traditional snu

 

If you are not interested in <a href=”https://www.my3dselfie.com/collections/wedding-cake-toppers”>Wedding gifts like wedding cake toppers</a> , then you have already missed a lot.

 

Trying to find 70s Style costumesrock ? Check out this page: https://www.costumesrock.com

At the moment one thing is certain is that there is no study on the harmfulness of electronic cigarettes. However, the authorities as well as medical professionals call the principle of vigilance.

At first glance the composition of the electronic cigarette seems in all respects less harmful than conventional cigarettes . No toxic or carcinogenic product is contained in the electronic cigarette, as the produced steam does not induce a change in chemical elements unlike the conventional burning cigarettes. However, with no long-term study on potential health risk should still remain vigilant authorities said.

The profusion of electronic cigarette manufacturer on the market today gives rise to products that are currently not yet standardized, and without the famous CE (European Conformity) these manufacturers can without difficulty modify or replace products generally used.

In addition, for professional electronic cigarette cultivates a certain ambiguity in particular at the resemblance to a conventional cigarette. Indeed, for certain models the resemblance is striking, for example with the red LED can remember the embers of tobacco. And all this will keep them by the smoking behavior of tobacco smoking and encourage young people towards a first step towards tobacco. This is why the use of the electronic cigarette is highly recommended for pregnant women, while sales to minors should be banned soon.

Finally, concerning the effects of electronic cigarette smoking cessation, opinions are far from settled and the debate is still open to those who believe firmly that this product can reduce the risk and should be considered as a mode of smoking cessation.